ARISTOTLE: On Tragedy (Entertainment and Education)
Why
do we go to movies? One GB participant
said it keeps life from being blah. In
Civilization and Its Discontents (GB1) Freud said “Life is too hard for us.” So according to Freud we go to movies for the
same reason we drink booze, use mind-altering drugs, play video games or turn
to religion. These are all just various forms
of psychological escapism. We use any
means we can find to escape from real life. Modern Man is constantly seeking relief from
the psychological stress and meaninglessness of modern civilization. Freud put it this way: “The question of the purpose
of human life has been raised countless times; it has never yet received a
satisfactory answer and perhaps does not admit of one.” Aristotle thinks that’s just plain nonsense. According to him (On Happiness GB1) “the good
which we have been seeking is a human good and the happiness a human happiness.” Most people don’t go to movies to escape from
real life. We go because it’s a very
human thing to do. We go to be
entertained and, in a looser sense of the term, to become educated. We learn about the world around us by seeing life
through the eyes of the director and rest of the film crew.
But
as Hamlet (GB3) says “all the world’s a stage.”
So why can’t we just go get entertained and become educated by watching “real
life” on a street corner somewhere?
Because we’re not Shakespeare or Aristotle or Sophocles or Euripides. To rise to the level of art real life has to
be filtered through carefully chosen words and images. A total experience, what Aristotle calls “a
complete whole,” must be condensed into a story lasting no more than two or
three hours. Condensing a story requires
the precision of a good artist. In this
section Aristotle shows four ways the good artist portrays a well-defined
Character. First, “All the characters
should be good.” This sounds a little
priggish. There are lots of modern movies
with bad guys. There were lots of plays in
his own day with bad guys. So what can
he mean by this? Aristotle says “goodness
is possible in every type of person.” We
don’t go to movies to become worse people.
We don’t necessarily go to movies to become better people either. But Aristotle says “Tragedy is an imitation of
persons better than the average man.” We
assume then that most people (average people) go to a movie to see performers
acting better than they themselves could do (either literally on the stage or
figuratively in the plot). That’s the entertainment
part. And we learn by imitating (either
consciously or subconsciously) the actors.
That’s the education part.
Whether
art (movies, music, painting, poetry, etc.) can make us better people is not
Aristotle’s focus in this selection. That
would be the subject of Ethics. He’s really
just evaluating the technical details of Tragedy; what makes it either good or
bad. And that’s more in the realm of Aesthetics. Aristotle thinks every subject can only be as
precise as that subject allows. Obviously
Tragedy is not Mathematics but he still thinks we can deduce common
characteristics from the many dramatic performances we’ve seen. Here are the three other rules Aristotle
would use in delineating Character. “All
the characters should be appropriate.” “All
the characters should be like the original.”
“All characters should remain consistent throughout the play.” Each one of these rules takes some serious
thinking to determine exactly what Aristotle means. But they’re well worth the effort. It’s all part of Aristotle’s method of educating
the theater- (or movie-) goer about how to distinguish between good art and bad
art. Obviously our world is much
different than the world Aristotle lived in.
Or is it? The question is still the
same. What’s the difference between
entertainment and education? Aristotle
thought those two activities could converge through art. Good art can be entertaining even as it
educates us to become better people.
Surely (despite Freud) this is a message that can still resonate in the
modern world.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home