ORTEGA: On Studying (Questions and Answers)
The
Great Books program is based on the simple method of reading a book, asking a
few questions, and then discussing those questions with others. In this selection Jose Ortega y Gasset tells
us that “no one can thoroughly understand an answer unless he has understood
the question.” The questions we ask about
a reading are just as important as the answers we give. Here’s an example. Ortega says subjects like “metaphysics or
geometry are here because men created them by brute force…” Statements like this lead us to formulate
questions. Was geometry “created” by
humans or did we “discover” geometric forms that had been there all along? When we ask questions like these we feel like
we’re on a quest for Truth. But Truth is
a slippery subject for Ortega. He
believes “we say that we have discovered a truth when we have found a certain
thought that satisfies an intellectual need we have previously felt. If we do not feel in need of that thought, it
will not be a truth for us.”
Really? Does that mean there’s
one truth for me and another truth for you, depending on the “intellectual need”
we feel at the time? Does that mean
truth changes every time my intellectual needs change? Or does truth remain the same regardless of
my personal intellectual needs? These
are questions that fall under the branch of philosophy called metaphysics, the
study of the nature of reality.
Metaphysics
sounds like a field of study best left to scholars. But Ortega doesn’t think so. He says “in order to truly understand
something, and most of all metaphysics, it is not necessary to have what is
called talent or to possess great prior wisdom… what is necessary is to have
need of metaphysics.” And Ortega
believes we all need metaphysics. An
obvious question follows. Why should I study
metaphysics? Because, says Ortega, “one
needs precisely what one does not have, what is lacking, what is not existent,
and the need, the demand, is that much stronger the less one has…” Ortega thinks the less I know about metaphysics
the more I really need it. This is a
paradox. If I’m looking for some Truth I
don’t already know then how do I know when I’ve found it? Ortega says “Truth, for the moment, is what
quiets an anxiety in our intelligence.” Truth,
at least for the moment, will satisfy the need I have to answer my own question. But in order for it to be a Truth for me it has
to be an answer to my own personal question.
Answering questions for an exam at school doesn’t count. In Ortega’s opinion exams never lead students
to discover their own Truths. He says “the
student is a human being, male or female, on whom life imposes the need to
study subjects for which he has felt no immediate, genuine need.”
In
a typical classroom “the typical student is one who does not feel the direct
need of a science, nor any real concern with it, and who yet sees himself
forced to busy himself with it.” The typical
student studies geometry, for example, not because he’s really interested in learning
about forms. He studies geometry only so
he can pass the next geometry test. Now
consider an adult who is long since out of school and well out of reach of
weekly exams. A question has been
bothering him. The question is
this. In a rapidly changing world is
there anything at all that’s permanent and stable and enduring? This is a classic question of metaphysics,
the very subject Ortega says we all need to study. Studying geometry may not give us the
definitive metaphysical answer we’re looking for. But contemplating the eternal nature of
triangles is the sort of thing that somehow “quiets an anxiety in our
intelligence.” And Ortega believes it’s
important for us to keep formulating these questions for ourselves throughout
our lives. Ortega is concerned that “generation
after generation the frightening mass of human knowledge which the student must
assimilate piles up.” The subjects keep
piling up and the exams keep getting longer and longer. Ortega’s antidote is this: ask your own
questions, find your own answers.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home