CONRAD: Heart of Darkness 2 (History and Darkness)
Joseph
Conrad had a dark vision of the human condition. If civilization is the culmination of human
achievement then fire is a good symbol of his vision of civilization. Conrad thinks we’re little better than savage
cavemen sitting around a fire, surrounded on every side by a vast forest of darkness. There’s no other light for hundreds of miles and
darkness threatens to overwhelm us at any moment. The only thing standing between
us and some terrible fate is this one little fire. Most people never have time to think about such
things; nor do we want to. We’re too busy making a living so we just huddle up
closer to the fire. Fire means comfort; cities,
law and order, culture and the pleasures of living among other human beings. But here’s the thought that worried Conrad. What if the fire goes out? Or, even worse, what if we forget how to make
fire?
History
is the way we pass knowledge down from one generation to the next. If civilization is like fire then history is
like a torch. We receive the torch from
others. It’s our job to keep the flame going
and pass it on. Conrad put it this way: “Each
station should be like a beacon on the road towards better things, a centre for
trade of course, but also for humanizing, improving, instructing.” At least that’s the theory. But theory belongs to philosophy, not to
history. When Socrates says “the
unexamined life is not worth living” he’s speaking to everyone at all times in
all places. Philosophy deals with
universal values but history deals with specific people doing specific things
at specific times and places. In this
story a man named Marlow is heading down the Congo River on a steamboat around
the turn of the nineteenth century to bring back a man named Kurtz. It would not have been the same story if it
had happened on the Mississippi River.
And
it wouldn’t have been the same story without the man named Kurtz. In many ways he represents the best that
Western civilization has to offer. “All
Europe contributed to the making of Kurtz” and no doubt he was well-read in
literature, philosophy and history and his painting showed him to be a very good
artist as well. Kurtz was a very
cultured man and “as he was good enough to say himself, his sympathies were in
the right place.” He was on the right
side of history according to the fashionable views of his time. He was a member of the International Society
for the Suppression of Savage Customs and was commissioned to write a report “for
its future guidance.” Marlow read the
report and it had started out all full of optimism. Kurtz wrote that “by the simple exercise of
our will we can exert a power for good practically unbounded.” But something went terribly wrong. He ended his report by scrawling a
handwritten note in the margin: “exterminate the brutes!” What had gone wrong? For months on end no one heard from
Kurtz. There were rumors he was sick and
“had recovered imperfectly.” There were
rumors he was not operating according to the rules of civilized behavior. That’s why Marlow was captain of a steamboat
sent to bring him back, back to civilization and the warmth of domesticated
fire.
Here’s
the special insight that makes Conrad’s story so disturbing. What if the darkness isn’t out there
somewhere, but inside; within us? Kurtz
isn’t the worst among us; he’s among the best.
He went down that river to bring the light of civilization to a dark
land. He went to bring trade and
commerce along with the benefits of civilization; art, literature, history and
philosophy. But Kurtz brought darkness in
with him. Removed from the restraining
influence of civilization he yielded to the primeval temptation of darkness
heard long ago in Genesis (GB1) “ye shall be as gods.” One of the lessons of history is that no
civilization and no individual is exempt from the lessons of history. The fire is fragile and civilization is just a
thin veneer covering up vast darkness. Scratch
that surface and history seems to confirm Conrad’s bleak view of humanity.
1 Comments:
Great postt
Post a Comment
<< Home